/ CONTEST
Architecture of the Future
A short-video contest on nudging, financial choice, and protection from fraud. Watch the entries, review the shared evaluation criteria, and explore the full archive.
Open full archive →Contest entries
Each work has a unique ID. Watch the video on Yandex Disk.
#8724887342
Do I really need this?Individual · AI used
#8729438653
A beginner fraudster tries online-course adviceTeam · AI used
#8729640423
Case No. 50%: Me vs my desiresTeam · AI used
#8729661322
One-click trap: Think. Check. Don’t fall for itIndividual · AI used
#8729663673
The last clickIndividual · AI used
#8729668373
Time-out!Team · AI used
#8729723492
Who decides for us?Individual · No AI
#8730465883
How a future AI assistant can protect against fraudstersIndividual · AI used
#8730485713
Danya-Pooh and the marketplaceIndividual · AI used
#8729344083
Helpful nudge: “Do you really need this?”Team · AI used
Evaluation criteria
Seven criteria, 100 points total. Whole numbers only.
Relevance to the theme and depth of the problem
20
Correct understanding of the behavioral mechanism
20
Ethics of the proposed solution
20
Creativity and originality
15
Clarity and persuasiveness
10
Practical and educational value
10
Technical execution quality
5
Total
100
Judging principles
- Objectivity — score against the criteria, not personal taste.
- Independence — individual scores are not aligned until judging is finished.
- Equal conditions — the same bar for individual and team entries.
- Technology neutrality — AI use alone does not lower a score; the result is judged.
- Confidentiality — individual scores stay private until official results.